Permanent Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Incidence, Predictors and Evolution of Left Ventricular Function / Marca-passo Definitivo após Implante Valvar Aórtico Transcateter: Incidência, Preditores e Evolução da Função Ventricular Esquerda

Abstract Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established procedure; however, atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) is a common complication. Objectives: To determine the incidence, predictors and clinical outcomes of PPI after TAVI, focusing on how PPI affects left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after TAVI. Methods: The Brazilian Multicenter TAVI Registry included 819 patients submitted to TAVI due to severe aortic stenosis from 22 centers from January/2008 to January/2015. After exclusions, the predictors of PPI were assessed in 670 patients by use of multivariate regression. Analysis of the ROC curve was used to measure the ability of the predictors; p < 0.05 was the significance level adopted. Results: Within 30 days from TAVI, 135 patients (20.1%) required PPI. Those patients were older (82.5 vs. 81.1 years; p = 0.047) and mainly of the male sex (59.3% vs 45%; p = 0.003). Hospital length of stay was longer in patients submitted to PPI (mean = 15.7 ± 25.7 vs. 11.8 ± 22.9 days; p < 0.001), but PPI affected neither all-cause death (26.7% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.80) nor cardiovascular death (14.1% vs. 14.8%; p = 0.84). By use of multivariate analysis, the previous presence of right bundle-branch block (RBBB) (OR, 6.19; 3.56-10.75; p ≤ 0.001), the use of CoreValve® prosthesis (OR, 3.16; 1.74-5.72; p ≤ 0.001) and baseline transaortic gradient > 50 mm Hg (OR, 1.86; 1.08-3.2; p = 0.025) were predictors of PPI. The estimated risk of PPI ranged from 4%, when none of those predictors was present, to 63%, in the presence of all of them. The model showed good ability to predict the need for PPI: 0.69 (95%CI: 0.64 - 0.74) in the ROC curve. The substudy of 287 echocardiograms during the 1-year follow-up showed worse LVEF course in patients submitted to PPI (p = 0.01). Conclusion: BRD prévio, gradiente aórtico médio > 50 mmHg e CoreValve® são preditores independentes de implante de MPD pós-TAVI. Ocorreu implante de MPD em aproximadamente 20% dos casos de TAVI, o que prolongou a internação hospitalar, mas não afetou a mortalidade. O implante de MPD afetou negativamente a FEVE pós-TAVI.

Resumo Fundamento: O implante valvar aórtico transcateter (TAVI) está bem estabelecido, porém, o bloqueio atrioventricular, com necessidade de marca-passo definitivo (MPD), é complicação frequente. Objetivo: Determinar a incidência, preditores e desfechos clínicos de implante de MPD após TAVI, focando em como a evolução da fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE), após o TAVI, é afetada pelo MPD. Métodos: No registro brasileiro foram incluídos 819 pacientes submetidos a TAVI por estenose aórtica severa em 22 centros entre janeiro/2008 e janeiro/2015. Após exclusões, os preditores de implante de MPD foram avaliados em 670 pacientes por regressão multivariada. Análise da curva ROC foi utilizada para medir a habilidade dos preditores; p < 0,05 foi considerado significativo. Resultados: Aos 30 dias, 135 pacientes (20,1%) necessitaram de MPD. Tais pacientes eram mais velhos (82,5 vs. 81,1 anos; p = 0,047) e predominantemente homens (59,3% vs 45%; p = 0,003). A permanência hospitalar foi maior no Grupo MPD (média= 15,7 ± 25,7 vs. 11,8 ± 22,9 dias; p < 0,001), mas o implante não afetou morte por qualquer causa (26,7% vs. 25,6%; p = 0,80) nem morte cardiovascular (14,1% vs. 14,8%; p = 0,84). Por análise multivariada, a presença prévia de bloqueio de ramo direito (BRD) (OR, 6,19; 3,56-10,75; p ≤ 0,001), o uso da prótese CoreValve® (OR, 3,16; 1,74-5,72; p ≤ 0,001) e gradiente transaórtico basal > 50 mmHg (OR, 1,86; 1,08-3,2; p= 0,025) foram preditores de implante de MPD. O risco estimado de implante de MPD foi 4%, quando nenhum dos fatores de risco estava presente, e 63% na presença de todos. O modelo mostrou boa habilidade de prever a necessidade de MPD: 0,69 (IC95%: 0,64 - 0,74) na curva ROC. Subestudo de 287 ecocardiogramas durante o seguimento de 1 ano mostrou pior evolução da FEVE no Grupo MPD (p = 0,01). Conclusão: Em crianças de 6 a 11 anos, circunferência da cintura aumentada está associada à PA elevada, mesmo quando o IMC é normal. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Permanent Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Incidence, Predictors and Evolution of Left Ventricular Function.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a well-established procedure; however, atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) is a common complication. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence, predictors and clinical outcomes of PPI after TAVI, focusing on how PPI affects left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after TAVI. METHODS: The Brazilian Multicenter TAVI Registry included 819 patients submitted to TAVI due to severe aortic stenosis from 22 centers from January/2008 to January/2015. After exclusions, the predictors of PPI were assessed in 670 patients by use of multivariate regression. Analysis of the ROC curve was used to measure the ability of the predictors; p < 0.05 was the significance level adopted. RESULTS: Within 30 days from TAVI, 135 patients (20.1%) required PPI. Those patients were older (82.5 vs. 81.1 years; p = 0.047) and mainly of the male sex (59.3% vs 45%; p = 0.003). Hospital length of stay was longer in patients submitted to PPI (mean = 15.7 ± 25.7 vs. 11.8 ± 22.9 days; p < 0.001), but PPI affected neither all-cause death (26.7% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.80) nor cardiovascular death (14.1% vs. 14.8%; p = 0.84). By use of multivariate analysis, the previous presence of right bundle-branch block (RBBB) (OR, 6.19; 3.56-10.75; p ≤ 0.001), the use of CoreValve® prosthesis (OR, 3.16; 1.74-5.72; p ≤ 0.001) and baseline transaortic gradient > 50 mm Hg (OR, 1.86; 1.08-3.2; p = 0.025) were predictors of PPI. The estimated risk of PPI ranged from 4%, when none of those predictors was present, to 63%, in the presence of all of them. The model showed good ability to predict the need for PPI: 0.69 (95%CI: 0.64 - 0.74) in the ROC curve. The substudy of 287 echocardiograms during the 1-year follow-up showed worse LVEF course in patients submitted to PPI (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: BRD prévio, gradiente aórtico médio > 50 mmHg e CoreValve® são preditores independentes de implante de MPD pós-TAVI. Ocorreu implante de MPD em aproximadamente 20% dos casos de TAVI, o que prolongou a internação hospitalar, mas não afetou a mortalidade. O implante de MPD afetou negativamente a FEVE pós-TAVI.

First results of the Brazilian Registry of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure / Primeiros Resultados do Registro Brasileiro de Oclusão Percutânea do Apêndice Atrial Esquerdo

Abstract Background: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective alternative to oral anticoagulation (OA) for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Objective: To present the immediate results and late outcomes of patients submitted to LAAC and included in the Brazilian Registry of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure. Methods: 91 patients with NVAF, high stroke risk (CHA2DS2VASc score = 4.5 ± 1.5) and restrictions to OAC (HAS-BLED score = 3.6 ± 1.0) underwent 92 LAAC procedures using either the Amplatzer cardiac plug or the Watchman device in 11 centers in Brazil, between late 2010 and mid 2016. Results: Ninety-six devices were used (1.04 device/procedure, including an additional non-dedicated device), with a procedural success rate of 97.8%. Associated procedures were performed in 8.7% of the patients. Complete LAAC was obtained in 93.3% of the successful cases. In cases of incomplete closure, no residual leak was larger than 2.5 mm. One patient needed simultaneous implantation of 2 devices. There were 7 periprocedural major (5 pericardial effusions requiring pericardiocentesis, 1 non-dedicated device embolization and 1 coronary air embolism without sequelae) and 4 minor complications. After 128.6 patient-years of follow-up there were 3 deaths unrelated to the procedure, 2 major bleedings (one of them in a patient with an unsuccessful LAAC), thrombus formation over the device in 2 cases (both resolved after resuming OAC for 3 months) and 2 strokes (2.2%). Conclusions: In this multicenter, real world registry, that included patients with NVAF and high thromboembolic and bleeding risks, LAAC effectively prevented stroke and bleeding when compared to the expected rates based on CHA2DS2VASc and HASBLED scores for this population. Complications rate of the procedure was acceptable considering the beginning of the learning curve of most of the involved operators.

Resumo Fundamento: A oclusão percutânea do apêndice atrial esquerdo (OAAE) é uma alternativa eficaz à anticoagulação oral (ACO) para a prevenção de acidente vascular cerebral (AVC) em pacientes com fibrilação atrial não-valvular (FANV). Objetivo: Apresentar os resultados imediatos e o seguimento tardio de pacientes submetidos a OAAE e incluídos no Registro Brasileiro de Oclusão Percutânea do Apêndice Atrial Esquerdo. Métodos: 91 pacientes com FANV, alto risco de AVC (escore CHA2DS2VASc = 4,5 ± 1,5) e restrição à AO (escore HAS-BLED = 3,6 ± 1,0) foram submetidos a 92 procedimentos de OAAE com as próteses Amplatzer Cardiac Plug e Watchman em 11 centros do Brasil, entre o final de 2010 e a metade de 2016. Resultados: Utilizaram-se 96 próteses no total (1,04 próteses/procedimento, incluindo-se o uso de 1 prótese não-dedicada adicional em um dos casos), obtendo-se sucesso em 97,8% dos procedimentos. Realizaram-se procedimentos associados à OAAE em 8,7% dos pacientes. Observou-se oclusão total do AAE em 93,3% dos casos com sucesso, e nos casos de oclusão incompleta, nenhum leak foi > 2,5 mm. Um paciente necessitou do implante simultâneo de 2 próteses. Houve 7 complicações maiores periprocedimento (5 derrames pericárdicos necessitando pericardiocentese, 1 embolização da prótese não-dedicada e 1 embolia aérea coronariana sem sequelas) e 4 menores. No seguimento de 128,6 pacientes-ano, houve 3 óbitos não relacionados ao procedimento, 2 sangramentos maiores (um deles em um dos casos de insucesso da OAAE), formação de trombo sobre a prótese em 2 casos (tratados com sucesso com reinstituição da ACO por 3 meses), e 2 AVCs (2,2%). Conclusões: Neste registro multicêntrico de mundo real, que incluiu pacientes com FANV e alto risco de sangramento e de eventos tromboembólicos, a OAAE foi eficaz na prevenção de AVC e sangramento quando comparada às taxas de AVC previstas pelos escores CHA2DS2VASc e HASBLED para esta população. O índice de complicações do procedimento foi aceitável, considerando se tratar do início da curva de aprendizado da maioria dos operadores envolvidos.

Clinical impact of baseline right bundle branch block in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

This study sought to assess the influence of baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB) on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality as well as sudden cardiac death (SCD) among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Few data exist regarding the late clinical impact of pre-existing RBBB in TAVR recipients. A total of 3,527 patients (mean age 82 8 years, 50.1% men) were evaluated according to the presence of RBBB on baseline electrocardiography. Intraventricular conduction abnormalities were classified according to the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology Foundation, and Heart Rhythm Society recommendations for standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. TAVR complications and causes of death were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 definitions. RBBB was present on baseline electrocardiography in 362 patients (10.3%) and associated with higher 30-day rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (40.1% vs. 13.5%; p < 0.001) and death (10.2% vs. 6.9%; p » 0.024). At a mean follow-up of 20 18 months, pre-existing RBBB was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 1.63; p » 0.014) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.89; p » 0.006) but not with SCD (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.22 to 2.32; p » 0.57). Patients with pre-existing RBBB and without PPI at discharge from the index hospitalization had the highest 2-year risk for cardiovascular death (27.8%; 95% CI: 20.9% to 36.1%; log-rank p » 0.007). In a subanalysis of 1,245 patients without PPI at discharge from the index hospitalization and with complete follow-up regarding the need for PPI, pre-existing RBBB was independently associated with the composite of SCD and PPI (HR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.16 to 6.17; p » 0.023)

Oclusão coronariana após TAVI: relato de estratégia de segurança / Coronary occlusion after TAVI: safety strategy report

O implante de valva aórtica transcateter (TAVI) é uma alternativa para pacientes com estenose aórtica de alto risco cirúrgico e para muitos daqueles considerados inoperáveis. Apesar de sua característica minimamente invasiva, podem ocorrer complicações relacionadas ao procedimento. Obstrução coronária durante o TAVI é uma complicação rara, com incidência inferior a 1%, mas potencialmente letal. Em nosso país, essa complicação foi encontrada em 0,72% dos procedimentos − 3 de 418 casos do Registro Brasileiro de Implante de Bioprótese Aórtica por Cateter − com mortalidade hospitalar de 100%. Apresentamos, neste relato de caso, medidas de prevenção e tratamento de oclusão coronária após o TAVI.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative for patients with aortic stenosis at high surgical risk and for many of those considered inoperable. Despite its minimally invasive features,complications related to the procedure may occur. Coronary obstruction during TAVI is a rare (incidence rate of less than 1%) but potentially lethal complication. In Brazil, this complication was found in 0.72% of procedures – three of 418 cases from the Brazilian Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Registry – with an in-hospital mortality rate of 100%. This case report presents prevention and treatment measures forcoronary occlusion after TAVI.

Resultados e perspectivas do implante valvar transaórtico (TAVI) / Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current status and future perspectives

A estenose aórtica é a doença vaI var cardíaca mais comum. Sua prevalência aumenta com a idade, afetando aproximadamente 3% da população com idade superior a 75 anos. Há décadas, a substituição cirúrgica da valva aórtica é o tratamento de eleição para pacientes com estenose aórtica importante sintomática, propiciando alívio dos sintomas e aumento da sobrevida. Entretanto, o risco cirúrgico aumenta com o avançar da idade e com a associação de comorbidades, o que faz com que mais de 1/3 dos idosos com estenose aórtica sintomática sejam recusados para a cirurgia. Frente a essa necessidade, Alan Cribier, em 2002, realizou o primeiro implante percutâneo de uma bioprótese valvar aórtica em seres humanos. No Brasil, a experiência com o implante valvar aórtico por cateter iniciou- se em janeiro de 2008, com a aprovação e disponibilidade do sistema CoreValve. Para avaliar os resultados desta nova modalidade de tratamento em nosso meio, a Sociedade Brasileira de Hemodinâmica e Cardiologia Intervencionista criou o Registro Brasileiro de Implante de Bioprótese Valvar Aórtica por Cateter. As evidências clínicas, empregando as próteses expansível por balão Sapien (Edwards Lifesciences) e autoexpansível CoreValve (Medtronic), indicam tratar-se de um procedimento seguro e altamente eficaz em pacientes selecionados. Atualmente, o implante de bioprótese aórtica por cateter é considerado a terapia de escolha para pacientes com estenose aórtica importante considerados inoperáveis e uma alternativa menos invasiva à cirurgia para pacientes com alto risco cirúrgico.

Aortic stenosis is the most common heart valve disease. Its prevalence increases with age, affecting approximately 3% of the population aged over 75 years. For decades, surgical aortic valve replacement has been the treatment of choice for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, providing relief of symptoms and increased survival. However, surgi cal risk increases with advancing age and with the association of comorbidities, which means that more than one third of elderly patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis are deemed inoperable. Given this unmet clinical need, Alan Cribier, in 2002, performed the first transcatheter aortic valve implantation in humans. In Brazil, the experience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation began in January 2008, with the approval and availability of the CoreValve system. To evaluate the results of this new treatment modality in Brazil, the Brazilian Society of Interventional Cardiology created the Brazilian Registry ofTranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Clinical evidence, employing the balloon-expandable Sapien prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences) and self-expanding CoreValve (Medtronic), indicate that it is a safe and highly effective procedure in selected patients. Currently, the transcatheter aortic valve implantation is considered the "gold standard" treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis deemed inoperable and an attractive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients at high surgical risk.

Segurança e eficácia dos stents farmacológicos eluidores de biolimus com polímero biodegradável: análise do registro EINSTEIN (Evaluation of Next-generation drug-eluting STEnt IN patients with coronary artery disease) / Safety and efficacy of biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer: insights from EINSTEIN (Evaluation of Next-generation drug-eluting STEnt IN patients with coronary artery disease) Registry

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a incidência de eventos adversos cardíacos maiores (morte cardíaca, infarto agudo do miocárdio ou necessidade de nova revascularização do vaso-alvo) em 1 ano em pacientes do "mundo real". MÉTODOS: O registro EINSTEIN é um estudo observacional prospectivo, unicêntrico, que incluiu consecutivamente 103 pacientes (152 lesões) tratados com o stent BiomatrixTM, eluidor de biolimus A9 e polímero biodegradável. RESULTADOS: A média das idades foi de 65,0±12,4 anos; o gênero masculino representou 83,5% dos pacientes; e 37,9% deles eram diabéticos. Em 1 ano, eventos adversos cardíacos maiores ocorreram em 11,7% dos pacientes, incluindo 2,9% de morte cardíaca, 4,9% de infarto agudo do miocárdio sem supradesnivelamento do segmento ST e 3,9% de revascularização do vaso-alvo. Trombose de stent esteve presente em apenas 1% (1 paciente) após o seguimento clínico de 1 ano. CONCLUSÃO: O presente registro sugere que os novos stents farmacológicos eluidores de biolimus A9 com polímero biodegradável são seguros e eficazes em pacientes da prática clínica diária, com baixas taxas de eventos adversos cardíacos maiores no longo prazo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, or acute myocardial infarct, or target vessel revascularization) at one year in "real world" patients. METHODS: The EINSTEIN registry is an observational, prospective, single center study that consecutively included 103 patients (152 lesions) treated with the BiomatrixTM stent, a biolimus A9-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer. RESULTS: The mean age was 65.0±12.4 years; male gender represented 83.5% of the patients; and 37.9% of them were diabetic. At one-year, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 11.7% of the patients, including 2.9% of cardiac death, 4.9% of with non ST- segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, and 3.9% of target vessel revascularization. Stent thrombosis occurred in only 1% (1 patient) at one-yearfollow-up. CONCLUSION: The present Registry suggests that new generation biolimus A9 drug-eluting stents are safe and effective in a "real world", all-comers patients, showing low rates of major cardiac adverse events on long-term follow-up.

Efeito da implementação de um protocolo assistencial de infarto agudo do miocárdio sobre os indicadores de qualidade / Effect of implementing an acute myocardial infarction guideline on quality indicators

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a adesão aos indicadores de qualidade assistencial ao longo da implementação de um protocolo assistencial de infarto agudo do miocárdio. MÉTODOS: Em 1º de março de 2005 foi implementado o protocolo assistencial de infarto agudo do miocárdio. Foram selecionados pacientes admitidos de 1ºde março de 2005 a 31 de dezembro de 2012 (n=1.431). Para comparação, utilizamos os dados de pacientes admitidos por infarto na fase pré-protocolo (n=306). Comparamos a taxa de adesão aos indicadores (taxa de prescrição de AAS na admissão hospitalar e na alta hospitalar, betabloqueador na alta e tempo porta-balão) entre as fases pré e pós-implementação do protocolo, além de tempo de permanência hospitalar e mortalidade intra-hospitalar nas diferentes fases. RESULTADOS: As taxas de prescrição de AAS na admissão e na alta hospitalar, e de betabloqueador foram maiores na fase pós versus a pré-implementação do protocolo: 99,6% versus 95,8% (p<0,001); 99,1% versus 95,8% (p<0,001) e 95,9% versus 81,7% (p<0,001), respectivamente. A taxa de prescrição de AAS aumentou ao longo da implementação do protocolo, atingindo 100% de 2009 a 2012. O tempo porta-balão pós versus pré foi de 86(32) minutos versus 93(51), respectivamente (p=0,20). O tempo de permanência hospitalar foi semelhante na fase pré versus pós-protocolo: 6(6) dias versus 6(4) dias (p=0,34). A mortalidade intra-hospitalar foi de 7,6% no pré-protocolo, 8,7% entre 2005 e 2008 e 5,3% entre 2009 e 2012 (p=0,04). CONCLUSÃO: A implementação do protocolo assistencial refletiu-se na maior adesão aos indicadores de qualidade.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the compliance rates to quality of care indicators along the implementation of an acute myocardial infarction clinical practice guideline. METHODS: A clinical guideline for acute myocardial infarction was introduced on March 1st, 2005. Patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction from March 1st, 2005 to December 31st, 2012 (n=1,431) were compared to patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction before the implementation of the protocol (n=306). Compliance rates to quality of care indicators (ASA prescription on hospital admission and discharge, betablockers on discharge and door-to-balloon time) as well as the length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality were compared before and after the implementation of the clinical guideline. RESULTS: The rates of ASA prescription on admission, on discharge and of betablockers were higher after guideline implementation: 99.6% versus 95.8% (p<0.001); 99.1% versus 95.8% (p<0.001); and 95.9% versus 81.7% (p<0.001), respectively. ASA prescription rate increased over time, reaching 100% from 2009 to 2012. Door-to-balloon time after versus before implementation was of 86(32) minutes versus 93(51) (p=0.20). The length of hospital stay after the implementation versus before was of 6(6) days versus 6(4) days (p=0.34). In-hospital mortality was 7.6% (before the implementation), 8.7% between 2005 and 2008, and 5.3% between 2009 and 2012, (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: The implementation of an acute myocardial infarction clinical practice guideline was associated with an increase in compliance to quality of care indicators.

Circulatory support in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.

Mortality is high in patients with acute coronary failure and cardiogenic shock. The most commonly used device for hemodynamic support is the intra-aortic balloon, which, however, may be insufficient in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This is a case report of a patient complaining of two days of intense and oppressive chest pain, radiating to the left arm. The ECG showed ST elevation. The patient was submitted to angioplasty and stent implant in the anterior descending artery and developed cardiogenic shock refractory to vasoactive drugs and intra-aortic balloon. Hemodynamic measures were carried out and we chose to use an Impella 2.5 device, by percutaneous route, for circulatory support.

Implante por cateter de bioprótese valvar para tratamento da estenose aórtica: experiência de três anos / Transcatheter bioprosthesis implantation for the treatment of aortic stenosis: three-year experience

FUNDAMENTO: O implante por cateter de bioprótese valvar aórtica é uma nova modalidade de tratamento para portadores de estenose aórtica inoperáveis ou de alto risco cirúrgico. Objetivo: Relatar a experiência de três anos do implante por cateter da bioprótese CoreValve. MÉTODOS: Entre janeiro de 2008 e janeiro de 2011, 35 pacientes com estenose aórtica (33 casos) ou disfunção de bioprótese valvar aórtica (dois casos) de alto risco cirúrgico foram submetidos ao implante da bioprótese CoreValve. RESULTADOS: A média de idade dos pacientes foi 81,5 ± 9 anos, e 80% apresentavam-se em classe funcional III ou IV de insuficiência cardíaca. O EuroScore foi 18,4 ± 14,3% e o STS 14,5 ± 11,6%. Obteve-se sucesso do implante em 34 (97,1%) pacientes. Após a intervenção houve redução do gradiente transvalvar de 84,9 ± 22 para 22,5 ± 9,5 mmHg e 87,1% dos pacientes evoluíram em classe funcional I ou II. A mortalidade aos 30 dias e no seguimento médio de 400 ± 298 dias foi, respectivamente, de 11,4% e 31,4%. A ocorrência de complicações hemorrágicas com risco de morte foi o único preditor independente de mortalidade cardiovascular. Acidente vascular cerebral ocorreu em 5,7% dos pacientes. Marca-passo permanente foi necessário em 32,1% dos casos no primeiro mês após o procedimento. CONCLUSÃO: O implante por cateter de bioprótese valvar aórtica é um procedimento seguro e eficaz para ser empregado em portadores de estenose aórtica de alto risco cirúrgico. O dispositivo CoreValve é eficaz no médio-prazo, em seguimento de até três anos.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis implantation is a new treatment modality for patients with aortic stenosis who are inoperable or at high surgical risk. OBJECTIVE: To report the three-year experience with transcatheter CoreValve® bioprosthesis implantation. METHODS: From January 2008 to January 2011, 35 patients with aortic stenosis (33) or aortic valve bioprosthesis dysfunction (two) at high surgical risk underwent transcatheter CoreValve® bioprosthesis implantation. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 81.5 ± 9 years, and 80% had heart failure functional class III or IV. The EuroScore was 18.4 ± 14.3% and the STS risk score was 14.5 ± 11.6%. Successful device implantation was achieved in 34 (97.1%) patients. After the intervention, a reduction in the transvalvular pressure gradient from 84.9 ± 22 to 22.5 ± 9.5 mm Hg was observed, and 87.1% of the patients progressed to functional class I or II. Thirty-day mortality and mortality in the follow-up of 400 ± 298 days were 11.4% and 31.4%, respectively. The occurrence of life-threatening hemorrhagic complications was the only independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Stroke occurred in 5.7% of the patients. Permanent pacemaker was required in 32.1% of the patients within the first month after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis implantation is a safe and effective procedure to be used in patients with aortic stenosis at high surgical risk. The CoreValve® prosthesis proved to have mid-term efficacy in a three-year follow-up.

Transcatheter bioprosthesis implantation for the treatment of aortic stenosis: three-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis implantation is a new treatment modality for patients with aortic stenosis who are inoperable or at high surgical risk. OBJECTIVE: To report the three-year experience with transcatheter CoreValve® bioprosthesis implantation. METHODS: From January 2008 to January 2011, 35 patients with aortic stenosis (33) or aortic valve bioprosthesis dysfunction (two) at high surgical risk underwent transcatheter CoreValve® bioprosthesis implantation. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 81.5 ± 9 years, and 80% had heart failure functional class III or IV. The EuroScore was 18.4 ± 14.3% and the STS risk score was 14.5 ± 11.6%. Successful device implantation was achieved in 34 (97.1%) patients. After the intervention, a reduction in the transvalvular pressure gradient from 84.9 ± 22 to 22.5 ± 9.5 mm Hg was observed, and 87.1% of the patients progressed to functional class I or II. Thirty-day mortality and mortality in the follow-up of 400 ± 298 days were 11.4% and 31.4%, respectively. The occurrence of life-threatening hemorrhagic complications was the only independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality. Stroke occurred in 5.7% of the patients. Permanent pacemaker was required in 32.1% of the patients within the first month after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter aortic bioprosthesis implantation is a safe and effective procedure to be used in patients with aortic stenosis at high surgical risk. The CoreValve® prosthesis proved to have mid-term efficacy in a three-year follow-up.

Assistência circulatória em choque cardiogênico pós-infarto agudo do miocárdio / Circulatory support in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction

Em pacientes com insuficiência coronariana aguda e choque cardiogênico, a mortalidade é alta. O dispositivo mais utilizado para suporte hemodinâmico é o balão intra-aórtico que, no entanto, pode ser insuficiente em pacientes com choque cardiogênico refratário. Relato de caso com dois dias de dor precordial opressiva e intensa, irradiada para membro superior esquerdo. ECG com supradesnivelamento anterior. Realizado angioplastia e implante de stent na artéria descendente anterior. Evolução com choque cardiogênico refratário ao uso de drogas vasoativas e balão intra-aórtico. Foram realizadas medidas hemodinâmicas e decidiu-se pela colocação do Impella® 2,5 por via percutânea para assistência circulatória.

Mortality is high in patients with acute coronary failure and cardiogenic shock. The most commonly used device for hemodynamic support is the intra-aortic balloon, which, however, may be insufficient in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This is a case report of a patient complaining of two days of intense and oppressive chest pain, radiating to the left arm. The ECG showed ST elevation. The patient was submitted to angioplasty and stent implant in the anterior descending artery and developed cardiogenic shock refractory to vasoactive drugs and intra-aortic balloon. Hemodynamic measures were carried out and we chose to use an Impella 2.5 device, by percutaneous route, for circulatory support.

Acesso pela artéria subclávia para implante por cateter da bioprótese valvar aórtica CoreValve®: dados do registro brasileiro / Subclavian access for transcatheter CoreValve® aortic prosthesis implantation: data from the brazilian registry

INTRODUÇÃO: A via de acesso transfemoral é preferencial para o implante por cateter de bioprótese valvar aórtica. Entretanto, algumas situações, como a presença de doença vascular periférica, impossibilitam a utilização desse acesso. Nesses casos, o acesso por dissecção da artéria subclávia é uma alternativa para a realização do procedimento. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar a experiência brasileira com a utilização da artéria subclávia como via de acesso para o implante por cateter da bioprótese CoreValve®. MÉTODOS: Foram requisitos para o procedimento área valvar aórtica < 1 cm², ânulo valvar aórtico ≥ 20 mm e ≤ 27 mm (CoreValve® de 26 mm e 29 mm), aorta ascendente ≤ 43 mm e artéria subclávia com diâmetro ≥ 6 mm, isenta de lesões obstrutivas significativas, tortuosidade acentuada e calcificação excessiva. O acesso pela artéria subclávia foi obtido por dissecção cirúrgica e, sob visão direta, punção da artéria subclávia. Obtido o acesso arterial, empregou-se a técnica padrão. RESULTADOS: Entre janeiro de 2008 e abril de 2012, 8 pacientes com doença vascular periférica foram submetidos a implante de prótese CoreValve® pela artéria subclávia em 4 instituições. O procedimento foi realizado com sucesso em todos os casos, com redução do gradiente transvalvar aórtico médio de 46,4 ± 17,5 mmHg para 9,3 ± 3,6 mmHg (P = 0,0018) e melhora dos sintomas. Aos 30 dias e no seguimento de 275 ± 231 dias, 87,5% e 62,5% dos pacientes, respectivamente, apresentavam-se livres de complicações maiores (óbito, infarto do miocárdio, acidente vascular cerebral e cirurgia cardíaca de urgência). CONCLUSÕES: Na experiência brasileira, o acesso pela artéria subclávia mostrou-se seguro e eficaz como via alternativa para o implante por cateter da bioprótese CoreValve®.

BACKGROUND: Transfemoral access is the preferred approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. However, some situations, such as the presence of peripheral vascular disease, preclude the use of such access. In these cases, subclavian access is an alternative approach for this procedure. This study aimed at evaluating the Brazilian experience using the subclavian approach for transcatheter CoreValve® prosthesis implantation. METHODS: Aortic valve area < 1 cm², aortic valve ring ≥ 20 mm and ≤ 27 mm (26 mm and 29 mm CoreValve®), ascending aorta ≤ 43 mm and subclavian artery with a diameter ≥ 6 mm, without significant obstructive lesions, marked tortuosity and excess calcification were requisites for the procedure. The access through the subclavian artery was obtained by surgical dissection and, under direct vision, a subclavian artery puncture was performed. Once artery access was obtained, the standard technique was used. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and April 2012, 8 patients with peripheral vascular disease underwent CoreValve® prosthesis implantation through the subclavian artery in 4 institutions. The procedure was successful in all cases with reduction of the mean transvalvular pressure gradient from 46.4 ± 17.5 mmHg to 9.3 ± 3.6 mmHg (P = 0.0018) and improvement of symptoms. At 30 days and after 275 ± 231 days of follow-up, 87.5% and 62.5% of the patients, respectively, were free from major adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke and urgent cardiac surgery). CONCLUSIONS: In the Brazilian experience, the subclavian access was a safe and effective alternative for transcatheter CoreValve® implantation.